Ticking Time Bomb

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Home
Single living bad for Environment

People who live alone are the biggest consumers of energy, land and household goods—from toothbrushes to appliances—and their solo lifestyles are creating an environmental time bomb, according to researchers at the University College, London.

In a report published in the journal Environment, Development and Sustainability, researchers conclude that the dramatic increase in the number of younger, more affluent people living alone is likely to cause a resource consumption crisis in England and Wales—and their findings should serve as a serious warning to other nations.

One-person Households Increasing Rapidly

“Current trends show that one-person households are growing more rapidly than other types of household,” said Dr. Jo Williams, UCL Bartlett School of Planning, in a university press release. “Previously, the typical one-person householder was the widow, often on a tight budget and thrifty.

The rise in younger, wealthier one-person households is having an increasingly serious impact on the environment.”

The number of one-person households in the UK has increased significantly over the last 30 years—from 18 percent of all households in 1971 to 30 percent in 2001. Experts believe that the figure will rise to 38 per cent—more than a third of all households—by 2026.

One-person Households Consume More Resources
 

According to the research, people who live in one-person households are the biggest consumers of energy, land and household goods—such as washing machines, refrigerators, televisions and stereos—per capita.

They consume 38 percent more products, 42 percent more packaging, 55 percent more electricity and 61 percent more gas per capita than four-person households.

In households of four or more, each person produces 1,000 kilograms of waste annually, while those living alone create a massive 1,600 kilograms of waste each year. One-person households also produce more carbon dioxide per person.

The typical one-person household no longer occupied by an elderly widow or widower. The fastest growth in one-person householders is among people between the ages of 25 and 44, particularly among men aged 35 to 44 who have never married.

Every week, these relatively young single men spend 39 percent more on household goods than one-person householders over age 60. And every year, they consume 13 percent more energy and use 6 percent more space than their older counterparts.

Alternatives to One-person Households

According to the report, the trend toward more one-person households using a disproportionate share of precious resources must be countered by providing environmentally friendly lifestyle choices, such as collective housing and ecological homes.

“The rise in one-person households is expected to account for 72 per cent of annual household growth between 2003 and 2026 according to government statistics,” Williams said.

“This means that, as part of the planned housing program for England and Wales, there is a real opportunity to house this group in ecological new builds that are prestigious, well-designed, state-of-the-art and environmentally sound.”

Williams said that people who live alone because of circumstance and not by choice might be interested in more collaborative lifestyles, such as co-housing alternatives in which residents have some private space, such as a bedroom and bathroom, but share living and storage areas.

Co-housing residents also typically share household chores such as cooking and gardening, and household goods such as tools and appliances, thus consuming less energy per person than people who live alone.

Reducing Environmental Impacts of One-person Households

The report urges the British government to introduce an occupancy tax on the inefficient use of space, and suggests designing and constructing more resource-efficient ecological homes. The researchers point out that one-person households are now wealthier than ever and, with the right advertising and a greater understanding of the problem, may be willing to invest in more environmentally friendly homes and products.

The researchers also advocate raising public awareness and encouraging more people to choose collective and collaborative lifestyle options through the use of relocation packages, educational programs and advertising campaigns to help reduce the future environmental impact of one-person households.

 
Monster wind turbines

Monster wind turbines with blade spans that dwarf the London Eye could be the shape of future green power, it has been revealed.An offshore turbine more than 500ft tall with a diameter of 475ft is due to make an appearance in British waters within the next two years.

Technology:

The Britannia turbine is still being developed but Clipper says even bigger blades are the future of green powerBut the 10 megawatt machine, dubbed Britannia, may only mark the start of a growing trend, according to the project's leader Bill Grainger.He sees no reason why offshore turbines should not get even larger, since greater size and power make economic sense.Mr Grainger, who heads the Britannia design team, told The Engineer magazine: 'There isn't a technical issue that screams out size limit.'You have to make changes as you get bigger.

Blades get floppier, for example, so you have to put more carbon in, but we aren't anywhere near 100% carbon yet.'Mr Grainger is engineering manager at Clipper Windpower Marine, the UK arm of the US company developing the 10 megawatt turbine.

The Britannia, being built at Blyth, Northumberland, will have three enormous blades, each weighing more than 30 tonnes.They will sweep a circle more than 100ft wider than the 400ft diameter of the London Eye.Standing on a solid foundation on the sea bed, the wind turbine will rise 574ft above the waves. 

With blades bigger than the London Eye the Britannia will be a 10 megawatt machineIt is expected to generate enough electricity to power 10,000 homes, and over its lifetime could displace the use of two million barrels of oil.

The most likely location for Britannia is Dogger Bank, off the north-east coast.Clipper Windpower Marine is sinking £44 million into the turbine's building facilities, including a blade factory in Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

The project is also receiving £5 million from the local regional development agency, One North East.Metal fatigue caused by the stress imposed by turning blades is one of the biggest engineering issues to be overcome by the Britannia team.But Mr Grainger does not believe the size of wind turbines will be restricted by technical hurdles.

He told The Engineer: 'There might be a limit to the size that people want to put into the field - if a 20 megawatt turbine failed, that's a big chunk of electricity to lose. 'But then, if a power station goes off-line you've lost 300 megawatts, so I don't think that's a limit either.

''They'll get bigger than 10 megawatts, is my feeling. How much bigger? I don't know.'

 
Emissions trading system

The European commission has quietly put a figure on the vast windfall that some of the most polluting corporations in Europe will get, courtesy of the badly thought out European Union emissions trading system (ETS).

And what a windfall it is! Steel firms, petrochemical companies, cement makers and the like are in line to share up to £10.5 billion as they cash in unused carbon credits given to them for free.

The ETS was trumpeted as a clever way to cut greenhouse-gas emissions but there were two crucial flaws.

First, governments were allowed to hand out carbon credits to their favourite industries, leading to massive over allocations to big polluters that threatened to re-locate if they didn’t get huge surpluses.

Second, those polluters can carry the unused allowances from the current phase of  the ETS (2008-2012) to the next (2013-2020).The commission now admits that because of the over allocation, combined with the sudden drop in emissions caused by the recession, up to 8% of the free 2009-2012 allowances could be carried over.

This would 765.5 million allowances which presently retail at £13 a throw.One big winner would be the French cement firm Lafarge, whose UK plants, whilst shedding jobs, stacked up a 1.4 million surplus in 2008 alone (worth 18.2 million at current prices).

But this pales besides Lakshmi Mittal . His Arcelor Mittal empire gained 4 million allowances (or £52 million) in 2008 even before the recession started to bite.The commission is now putting out arguments about increasing the EU’s emission reduction targets up to 2020.

All well and good, but should this happen, demand for carbon allowances will rise, meaning the windfall for the biggest polluters will double.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 13 - 16 of 79

Polls

What's your preferred energy generation options?
 
© 2010 The Environmentalist
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.